CATEGORY |
20 points |
15 points |
10 points |
5 points |
Olga's comments |
Background |
Background enhances text and graphics and does not add clutter to presentation. The background is consistent from slide to slide and appropriately reflects theme or content of presentation.
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics and is consistent from slide to slide.
|
Background does not detract from text or other graphics but may be distracting at times.
|
Background makes it difficult to see text or competes with other graphics on the page.
|
|
Text - Font Choice & Formatting
|
Font formats (e.g., face, color) enhance readability and content, are consistent throughout the presentation, and reflect principles of good design (size, number of words per bullet, relation to graphics).
|
Font formats are readable, consistent through most of the presentation and reflect principles of good design.
|
Font formatting may complement the content but it is difficult to read or does not follow the principles of good design.
|
Font formatting makes it very difficult to read the material. There is no consistency among fonts used or more than 3 fonts are used.
|
|
Transitions and Animations
|
Slide transitions and animations are effective and enhance the overall "look" of this project; they do not detract from the content.
|
Transitions between slides are present and work. Some animations on A few may detract from the presentation.
|
Transitions and some animations are present but detract from the content of the presentation.
|
There are no transitions or animations.
|
|
Use of Graphics
|
All graphics and photos are attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation; they are clear and are not pixelated.
|
A few graphics are not attractive (too big, pixilated, etc.) but all support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
All graphics are attractive but a few do not seem to support the theme/content of the presentation.
|
Several graphics are unattractive AND detract from the content of the presentation or there is a distinct lack of graphics.
|
|
Sources
|
Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. All documented in desired format (APA)within the slide or at the end of the presentation.
|
Source information collected for all graphics, facts and quotes. Most documented in desired format.
|
Source information collected for graphics, facts and quotes, but not documented in desired format.
|
Very little or no source information was documented.
|
|
Originality - Design
|
Presentation shows considerable originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a unique and interesting way.
|
Presentation shows some originality and inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in an interesting way.
|
Presentation shows an attempt at originality and inventiveness on 1-2 slides.
|
Presentation and/or graphics show very little attempt at original presentation.
|
|
Spelling and Grammar
|
Presentation has no misspellings or grammatical errors.
|
Presentation has 1-2 misspellings and grammatical mistakes
|
Presentation has 3-5 grammatical errors and misspellings.
|
Presentation has more than 5 grammatical and/or spelling errors.
|
|
Content |
Includes data for 3 consecutive years, incuding Key Areas; explanation of all discrepancies; and recommendations for improving scores in future years.
|
Missing 1 element.
|
Missing 2-3 elements.
|
Missing 4+ elements.
|
|
Total Score
|
________/160
|
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.