If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.
You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!
Saved by Linda Newell
on April 15, 2012 at 2:24:04 pm
Introduction
Even if you are not a proponent of collaboration as a pedagogic tenet, you must admit there is quite a bit of research on the subject. Many feel it is integral in preparing our students for life in a 21st century, global workplace. But how should this look in the classroom? How do teachers introduce and develop these skills in their students? And finally, how can Web 2.0 tools provide a motivational and engaging scaffold for this development in our students?
Learning Outcomes
To continue to investigate, analyze, produce, and evaluate technology-based strategies which will meet the educational needs of this type of learner:
Seminar option 2 allows you listen to the archives of any missed seminar and post a 350+ synopsis. Be sure to include your name and section number. Happy synop-sizing!
Name
Course
Uploaded synopsis (Word document)
Weekly Assignment
By nature, Web 2.0 tools are collaborative. One of the leaders in collaborative tool-making is
2. Find a partner. (I ask that this not be someone you worked with in the Week 11 assignment. Feel free to mix between sections. I am to be included as a member of every team - linda.newell@utb.edu .)
3. Using Google Docs / Documents, create a case study with your partner using the MTT case study as a model. While it is expected there will be some similarities with regard to the format and flow of the MTT case study, your prompt should show a significant amount of differentiation that indicates a very high level of critical thinking and application. (Note: the five tasks at the end are the same for every case study in the MTT exam. Therefore, yours should be worded the same. Just modify the items that need to be changed in order to reflect the prompt. Also, in task #5, choose two different content areas as those do change from test to test.) It MUST be saved as Name-Name-CCS.
4. Upon completion, find a partner team and exchange invitations to review each other's case study. (Use the invite tool.)
5. With your partner, collaboratively respond to your partner team's case study via a new document. ( Again, I am to to be invited.) It MUST be saved as Name-Name-response to CCS.
6. After the collaborative response has been completed, it should be sent back to the creating team. The creating team will then collaboratively score the case study based upon the analytic scoring guidelines in chapter 6 of the MTT preparation manual.
7. Using Google Docs / Presentations, the creating team should craft the collaborative grading response as follows:
Slide 1 - Give title with names of creators and responders
Slide 2 - Copy of prompt (may require 2 slides)
Slide 3 - Available technologies
Slide 4 - Task 1
describe task
give grade based upon the analytic scoring guidelines
give rationale for grade selection
Slide 5 - Task 2
describe task
give grade based upon the analytic scoring guidelines
give rationale for grade selection
Slide 6 - Task 3
describe task
give grade based upon the analytic scoring guidelines
give rationale for grade selection
Slide 7 - Task 4
describe task
give grade based upon the analytic scoring guidelines
give rationale for grade selection
Slide 8 - Task 5
describe task
give grade based upon the analytic scoring guidelines
give rationale for grade selection
8. The presentation should then be shared with the partner team, using the invite tool. Invite me as well. It MUST be saved as Name-Name-scoring CCS.
9. This will be due at the end of Week 14, on Sunday at midnight.
Note: Collaboration entries and times are automatically recorded in Google Docs. The framework within which all grades will be based is the level of quality and involvement, which is expected to be balanced, appropriate, and shared.
Your grade will be predicated upon the following:
To do
Points
Using MTT case study as a model, collaboratively create a case study (CCS)
10
CCS should follow the format of the MTT version, but reflect individuality and a high level of differentiation, critical thinking, and analysis
10
Collaboratively respond to partner team's CCS
15
Collaboratively score and create presentation response which addresses the outcomes of the scoring session
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.